|
|
looks smooth and all, but if its supposed to be a macro-style drop of something, it sure doesnt look like it
Wed, Nov 28th at 09:26am (7 years ago)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dammit, BoganMan. Every paper I've seen you review has been like "this sucks ass, so and so, blah blah, you used Bryce, etc."...Lower your standards or something. Actually TRY to find something good about a paper instead of the bad points.
|
|
|
Looks good... color's a bit strange... 2 shades of blue maybe?
|
|
|
I like this. Colors are nice. Also, why must people judge an image on the program it was made in? I don't care if it was Bryce. Hell, I've never even seen Bryce. I just care if I like it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty reasonable, considering it's bryce. But still, -20 for using it and -10 because I think it looks a bit too plain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree with Cogo, wrong colors, maybe a blue and make the water below it ripple more. Then it's cool!
|
|
|
The image looks cool ... but the colors are kinda wrong.
|
|
|
elegant, though too angular at the joining points. also, I don't think sigs are necessary...
|
|
|
wow, this is mad cool! it's got a serene, almost meditative/spiritual quality to it. very contemplative. hey you other reviewers, try to look at the shapes rendered, rather than with what tool they were rendered. any tool is a good one. i've seen some pretty mean pictures created with crayons... :^] the title of this, on the other hand... well, that's just silly...
|
|
|
b.w. (Bryce wanking). colors ok.
|
|
|
Reflection and odd color choice make it intriguing.
|
|
|
weird...surprisingly not irritating for 3d art.
|
|
|
Hmm I like...but not the color...maybe blue and white?
|
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's free, and takes just a few seconds to complete!
|
) or from the image's palette (
).
To save your palette, you must sign up.
