|
|
Trendwhore is back! I can only imagine the time spent doing all of the t.w. elements in this piece. Great wall.
Wed, Jan 19th at 10:22am (4 years ago)
|
|
|
nicely done!
Wed, Jan 19th at 10:37am (4 years ago)
|
|
|
not bad, but i think there are way way way too many trendwhore elements. mixed, there's nothing wrong with trendwhore, there's just too much of it in this case. ne way dont know where uvebeen but i havent dont techy trendwhore stuff for ages :)
Wed, Jan 19th at 10:50am (4 years ago)
|
|
|
photo is hot, the 2d is solid, if a little overdone.
Wed, Jan 19th at 10:52am (4 years ago)
|
|
|
|
|
|
better and better
Wed, Jan 19th at 12:16pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
schweeet :)
Wed, Jan 19th at 12:18pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
really good... hey are you on Deviant art too.. i thought i saw some stuff like this b4...
maybe it was you...?
grood work..
Wed, Jan 19th at 12:37pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
Photo is nice, but theirs just WAY to much crap on here.. i agree with liqachu, also... you can obviously see that not much time was spent on the elements, they are all brushes.. im not sure what Arznek is talking about..
Wed, Jan 19th at 01:00pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
Great photo. *Most* of the tw is pretty sweet but I agree with their being too much, especially the little bits which at first glance look like blemishes on the photo (dust etc) -- although maybe that's what you were after.
Wed, Jan 19th at 01:28pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
I would like to just have the photo as a wall. mind submitting it?
Wed, Jan 19th at 02:06pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
this is a beauty ....definitly front page stuff...
Wed, Jan 19th at 03:14pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
i like it very much:)
Thu, Jan 20th at 12:09pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
what happened to the photo ... you destroyed it, nature and technology can never co-exist (unless you're a landscape architech, then you've got an excuse ;] ). average wall.
Thu, Jan 20th at 06:00pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
liqachu: [-] not bad, but i think there are way way way too many trendwhore elements.
isn't all your stuff trendwhore? :)
Thu, Jan 20th at 11:02pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
everyone is different, there are a lot of ways to xpress something. he WANTED to overuse those tiny elements there. It seems if u put more than 2 elements in a wal, and they are not black and white, ppl just see an average work. I like the wall, well done.
Fri, Jan 21st at 04:41am (4 years ago)
|
|
|
this is a nice wall, simply said. nothing too unique about it, nothing too special, but its just pleasing to the eye.
Fri, Jan 21st at 04:25pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
i really liked be_unique, and this one is almost on par! great wall.
Sat, Jan 22nd at 06:18am (4 years ago)
|
|
|
It's a great wallpaper, but I will NEVER use if it has a typo.
Sat, Jan 22nd at 06:42am (4 years ago)
|
|
|
I love this very much, but if you submitted just the photo, I would love you even more!!!
Mon, Jan 24th at 08:42pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
How sad. I liked the flower in BE UNIQUE. Did ya really have to chop it off?? ;-)
Thu, Jan 27th at 04:28pm (4 years ago)
|
|
|
this is the start of something awesome - the nature/digital balance is sorta corrupted by the blur/sharpness overlay
Wed, Feb 2nd at 12:40am (4 years ago)
|
|
|
i wish i could lovex5 this wall
Mon, Jul 2nd at 12:50pm (2 years ago)
|
|
|
Wow, awe-inspiring. ^^
I must practice more!
Fri, Sep 7th at 12:27am (2 years ago)
|
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's free, and takes just a few seconds to complete!
|
) or from the image's palette (
).
To save your palette, you must sign up.
its called, back to the old school :P
THANKS FOR THE FEATURED SKIN!!!!
spencius yeah I am, cybergenics.deviantart.com